This document is a how-to for building new packaages for scripts.mit.edu.

Prerequisites
=============

  * A trusted scripts.mit.edu server
  * A scripts-build account on that server (but that was created when it
    was installed, or something's wrong)
  * A set of personal credentials for the scripts svn repo

Directions
==========

  * Log into the server as root

  * /bin/su scripts-build # It's a bad idea to build as root.  This is
                          # less urgent than it used to be, because you'll
			  # be building using mock in a chroot, but it's
			  # still good habit.  Also, if you work in
			  # /srv/repository as root, scripts-build won't
			  # be able to change some of the resulting files

  * cd /srv/repository

  * svn up  # Important both to build with current code, and because the
            # svn revision becomes part of the package release number,
	    # and you can infer whether changes in the code were made
	    # before or after a particular build by looking at the package
	    # and svn release/revision.

  * cd server/fedora

  * # Look in the .dload directory.  If you want to build with a newer
    # version of any upstream packages that are there, then
    * rm .dload/[OLD-PACKAGES].src.rpm # It's fine to delete all SRPMs here
    * rm download_stamp

  * make [PACKAGE-YOU-WANT] # e.g. 'make httpd' builds Apache with our patches
    # Note that openafs-devel is a build-dependency of accountadm, so if
    # this is a new Fedora release being bootstrapped, you'll have to
    # build openafs and install its -devel package before building accountadm

  * # If the build succeeds, the mock logs, build log, binary and SRPMs
    # will be in /var/lib/mock/fedora-[RELEASE]-{x86_64|i386}/result (note that
    # this will be cleared out each time you start a new build, so if
    # you're building several packages in succession, copy the results
    # somewhere safe after each build to preserve them)
    # Add the packages to the repository by using a trusted machine and
    krootscp root@[BUILD-SERVER]:/var/lib/mock/fedora-[RELEASE]-{x86_64|i386}/result /mit/scripts/yum-repos/rpm-fc[RELEASE]

    # There has been some historic discussion about whether SRPMs should be
    # added to the repository. At this point, the standard is to include them.

  * # Rebuild the repo metadata to include the new packages.
    cd /mit/scripts/yum-repos/rpm-fc[RELEASE]
    # If you have a trusted machine:
    createrepo -d .
    # Otherwise, on a scripts server, as root:
    mkdir /root/repodata-YYYYMMDD # Or any suitable temp directory
    createrepo -d -o /root/repodata-YYYYMMDD .
    # Then from your trusted machine
    krootscp -r root@[BUILD-SERVER]:/root/repodata-YYYYMMDD /mit/scripts/yum-repos/rpm-fc[RELEASE]
    # Sanity check the files, and then replace the current repodata directory
    # with the one in repodata-YYYYMMDD.

Patching packages
=================

  * To make changes to the packages that we are the upstream maintainers
    of (that is, the packages that the Scripts Team wrote):
    * The authoritative source lives in server/common/oursrc/[PACKAGE]
    * The RPM spec file is server/fedora/specs/[PACAKGE].spec
    * You directly make the relevant changes to those files, commit to
      svn, and then rebuild the package as above to include the new changes.

  * To make changes to the upstream packages that we "scriptsify":

    * If we haven't previously scriptsified this package, you'll need
      to add it to the upstream_yum line in SVN/server/fedora/Makefile,
      and remove the download_stamp file so that it gets fetched next
      time you run 'make [PACKAGE]'.

    * The authoritative upstream source comes from the SRPM in the upstream
      yum repo, or in odd cases like openafs, from some other URL.  When
      you 'make [PACKAGE]' in SVN/server/fedora, if download_stamp has
      been removed, the SRPMs are all refetched into
      SVN/server/fedora/.dload, and then installed with 'rpm -i'.  This
      results in the source patches, and tarballs landing in ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES
      and the spec files landing in ~/rpmbuild/SPECS.  You can also
      manually get individual SRPMs for a package by doing this (these
      steps work fine as a mortal user, including the 'rpm -i'):
      * yumdownloader --source [PACKAGE]
        # That deposits [PACKAGE]-[VER]-[RELEASE].src.rpm in the current dir
      * rpm -i [PACAKGE]-[VER]-[RELEASE].src.rpm
        # That unpacks the SRPM, placing the source tarball and patches in
	# ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES and the spec file in ~/rpmbuild/SPECS; it
	# does *not* globally install anything, and doesn't require root
      If you prefer to not install the file, you can simply extract it
      into a directory by running:
      * /mit/ghudson/scripts/rpmx [PACKAGE]-[VER]-[RELEASE].src.rpm

    * If you develop a patch to the upstream source, you should save a
      diff with your changes and add it to the repo as
      SVN/server/common/patches/[PACKAGE]-[SHORT_DESCRIPTIVE_STRING].patch

    * To cause your patch to be applied when the package is built, you
      will need to save a copy of the original spec file for the upstream
      package, then modify it to add a line like:
        Patch[NUM]: [PACKAGE]-[SHORT_DESCRIPTOVE_STRING].patch
	# This should generally go after the last existing Patch line
	# in the file, and [NUM] should be significantly larger than
	# the upstream Fedora patches, to avoid conflicts later.  This
	# line tells rpmbuild where the contents of the patch live.
      You also add a line like:
        %patch[NUM] -p1 -b .[SHORT_DESCRIPTIVE_STRING]
	# This should generally go after the last existing %patch line
	# in the file, [NUM] should be the same as in the Patch line, and
	# tells rpmbuild that this is the point at which to actually apply
	# the patch

    * The Release tag in the spec file should have ".scripts.%{scriptsversion}
      inserted into it just before %{?dist}, or at the end of the release
      if %{?dist} is unused.
      # e.g.          Release: 1%{?dist}
      # changes to    Release: 1.scripts.%{scriptsversion}%{?dist}
      This causes the package version to include the string "scripts"
      and our SVN revision number (which is set by the Makefile) for
      easy identification (this version will also be greater than the
      upstream version, so the system will prefer to update to it).

    * If the scriptsified version of the package needs to be installed
      on the servers, and a new upstream version would break scripts
      without our changes, add a line like this:
        Provides: scripts-[PACKAGE]
      and correspondingly, add "scripts-[PACKAGE]" to the Requires line
      in SVN/server/fedora/specs/scripts-base.spec (and remember to
      build, upload, and deploy a new scripts-base package)

    * Though we're not always good about it, do feel encouraged to add
      an entry at the top of the %changelog section near the bottom of
      the spec file explaining your modifications

    * When you're finished with the updates to the upstream spec file,
      create a diff from the upstream spec file to your new version,
      and add it to the SVN repo as
        SVN/server/fedora/specs/[PACKAGE].spec.patch
      Make sure to copy it there before you try to build the package,
      since if you don't mock will use the original specfile (and
      overwrite any changes you made in place).

Replacing the source of packages
===============================

    * Patch the specfile to have an alternate Source0 (or SourceX) URL
      pointing to the updated source of the package.  You will then
      need to add a spectool line to the Makefile to ensure this new
      source gets downloaded on build:
        spectool -g -R $(specs)/PACKAGE-NAME.spec

Tips
====

    * Don't try to build a 32-bit package without building the 64-bit
      package as well.
